<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real-life DDD: organise code by responsibility layers, not repositories and services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richarddingwall.name/2009/08/08/real-life-ddd-organise-code-by-responsibility-layers-not-repositories-and-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richarddingwall.name/2009/08/08/real-life-ddd-organise-code-by-responsibility-layers-not-repositories-and-services/</link>
	<description>The adventures of a young kiwi software developer in London</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 06:56:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock &#187; The Morning Brew #408</title>
		<link>http://richarddingwall.name/2009/08/08/real-life-ddd-organise-code-by-responsibility-layers-not-repositories-and-services/comment-page-1/#comment-8701</link>
		<dc:creator>Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock &#187; The Morning Brew #408</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richarddingwall.name/?p=1634#comment-8701</guid>
		<description>[...] Real-life DDD: organise code by responsibility layers, not repositories and services - Richard Dingwall argues that you should shun the common organisation of code into folders of the type of thing they are, and move instead to using the responsibilities of code to decide where they should be located [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Real-life DDD: organise code by responsibility layers, not repositories and services &#8211; Richard Dingwall argues that you should shun the common organisation of code into folders of the type of thing they are, and move instead to using the responsibilities of code to decide where they should be located [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kane</title>
		<link>http://richarddingwall.name/2009/08/08/real-life-ddd-organise-code-by-responsibility-layers-not-repositories-and-services/comment-page-1/#comment-8698</link>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richarddingwall.name/?p=1634#comment-8698</guid>
		<description>Great idea, it seems logical... I wonder why I&#039;ve never thought of it myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea, it seems logical&#8230; I wonder why I&#8217;ve never thought of it myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 9eFish</title>
		<link>http://richarddingwall.name/2009/08/08/real-life-ddd-organise-code-by-responsibility-layers-not-repositories-and-services/comment-page-1/#comment-8683</link>
		<dc:creator>9eFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 13:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richarddingwall.name/?p=1634#comment-8683</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Richard Dingwall  » Real-life DDD: organise code by responsibility layers, not repositories and services...&lt;/strong&gt;

9efish.感谢你的文章 - Trackback from 9eFish...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Richard Dingwall  » Real-life DDD: organise code by responsibility layers, not repositories and services&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>9efish.感谢你的文章 &#8211; Trackback from 9eFish&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
